Soil Comparisons in a Disturbed Chaparral Area: Evidence of Primary Succession

Abstract

In 1996, the construction excavation of a mature chaparral area at Flintridge Sacred Heart Academy created a barren area named the Cut, stripped of previously present plants, nutrients, organic matter, and soil. Thirty years later, this area is slowly redeveloping and appears to be a stable community with sparse vegetation surrounded by chaparral and coastal sage scrub. The severe nature of the disturbance means that primary succession is most likely the successional pathway to recovery. This study focuses on the slow recovery of a disturbed chaparral ecosystem through soil and ecological analyses, including tests of nutrient levels, pH, organic matter content, clay composition, and root depth, while comparing the cut to the surrounding mature chaparral. Our results show that despite the disturbance, the Cut is undergoing slow primary succession. The key findings include depleted nutrients, regular pH, elevated clay and organic matter content, higher water retention, longer water infiltration, and shorter plant root depth, all in the cut, indicating characteristics of an area going through primary succession. This study confirms that chaparral ecosystems can recover from severe disturbances through primary succession, albeit at a slow rate. These findings underscore the importance of long-term monitoring to understand the trajectory of ecosystem recovery.

pdf

References

Clark, C. A. (2023). The important role of soil texture on water. Crops and Soils; University of Wisconsin-Madison. https://cropsandsoils.extension.wisc.edu/articles/the-important-role-of-soil-texture-on-water/

Curell, C. (2011, November 11). Why is Soil Water Holding Capacity Important? MSU Extension; Michigan State University. https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/why_is_soil_water_holding_capacity_important

Foster, A. B., & Fox, A. C. (1970). Teaching soil and water conservation a classroom and field guide (Slightly rev). U.S. Soil Conservation Service. http://books.google.com/books?id=s-JFAQAAIAAJ

GeoEngineer. (2022). Step-by-Step Guide for Grain Size Analysis. Www.geoengineer.org. https://www.geoengineer.org/education/laboratory-testing/step-by-step-guide-for-grain-size-analysis

Google Earth. (1994 and 2025). Transformation of the Cut and Chaparral, Cut and Chaparral 1994, Cut and Chaparral 2025, Visual Representation of Surveyed Area. [Satellite imagery]. Google. https://earth.google.com/

Halsey, R. W., & Keeley, J. E. (2016). Conservation issues: California chaparral. Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.09584-1

Hanes, T. L. (1971). Succession after fire in the chaparral of southern California. Ecological Monographs, 41(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942434

Hoogsteen, M. J. J., Lantinga, E. A., Bakker, E. J., Groot, J. C. J., & Tittonell, P. A. (2015). Estimating soil organic carbon through loss on ignition: effects of ignition conditions and structural water loss. European Journal of Soil Science, 66(2), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12224

Hubbert K. R., Oriol V. (2005) Temporal fluctuations in soil water repellency following wildfire in chaparral steeplands, southern California. International Journal of Wildland Fire 14, 439-447.https://doi.org/10.1071/WF05036

Li, G., Fang, C., Li, Y. et al. Global impacts of future urban expansion on terrestrial vertebrate diversity. Nat Commun 13, 1628 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29324-2

Lu, D., Moran, E. and Mausel, P. (2002), Linking Amazonian secondary succession forest growth to soil properties. Land Degrad. Dev., 13: 331-343. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.516

Luster Leaf Products, Inc. (n.d.). Soil test kit instructions (Model 1601) [PDF]. Luster Leaf. http://www.lusterleaf.com/img/instruction/1601-soiltestkit_instructions.pdf

California Coastal Sage and Chaparral. (2020). One Earth.

https://www.oneearth.org/ecoregions/california-coastal-sage-and-chaparral/

Parkes, S. (2025). Erosion and Sedimentation | Managing Semi-Arid Watersheds: Central Arizona Highlands. Usda.gov. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/boise/AWAE/labs/awae_flagstaff/highlands/erosionsedimentation.html

Robertson, S. (2011). Direct Estimation of Organic Matter by Loss on Ignition: Methods. https://www.sfu.ca/geog/soils/lab_documents/Estimation_Of_Organic_Matter_By_LOI.pdf Schomakers, J., Jien, S. H., Lee, T. Y., Huang, J. C., Hseu,

Z. Y., Lin, Z. L., Lee, L. C., Hein, T., Mentler, A., & Zehetner, F. (2019). Soil and biomass carbon re-accumulation after landslide disturbances. Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 288, 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.032

Sener, H. (2024, November 16). How Plant Succession Enhances Soil Health and Promotes Ecosystem Stability. Permalogica. https://www.permalogica.com/post/how-plant-succession-enhances-soil-health-and-promotes-ecosystem-stability

Storie, R.E., Harradine, F. Soils of California. Soil Science 85(4):p 207-227, April 1958.

Syphard, A. D., Brennan, T. J., & Keeley, J. E. (2018). Chaparral landscape conversion in Southern California. In E. C. Underwood, H. D. Safford, N. A. Molinari, & J. E. Keeley (Eds.), Valuing chaparral: Ecological, socioeconomic, and management perspectives (pp. 323–345). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68303-4_12

Trautwein, B., & Harris, E. (2015, July 20). Secret treasures of our threatened chaparral forest. Environmental Defense Center. https://www.environmentaldefensecenter.org/secret-treasures-of-our-threatened-chaparral-forest/

USDA. (n.d.). USDA. Measuring Soil Health: Infiltration. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/cmis_proxy/https/ecm.nrcs.usda.gov:443/fncmis/resources/WEBP/ContentStream/idd_F0EF7A61-0000-CC17-A648-8DD17684E276/0/1percentinfiltration.pdf

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. (1981). Soils: Chaparral shrublands. Rocky Mountain Research Station. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/boise/AWAE/labs/awae_flagstaff/highlands/vegetation/chaparral/chsoils.html

Vogl, R. J. (1981). Chaparral succession. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Dynamics and Management of Mediterranean-type Ecosystems (pp. 81–88). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.

https://www.fs.usda.gov/psw/publications/documents/psw_gtr058/psw_gtr058_2a_vogl.pdf

Vourlitis, G.L., Pasquini, S.C. & Mustard, R. Effects of Dry-Season N Input on the Productivity and N Storage of Mediterranean-Type Shrublands. Ecosystems 12, 473–488 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9236-6

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Shannon Dunn, Rachel Pangilinan