Abstract
If humanity had a time machine, would we stop the nuclear bomb from ever being created? Perhaps someone could erase all knowledge of humankind's most lethal and destructive weapon. Maybe this way, humanity would not live in an unceasing shadow of violence, fear, and total annihilation. The only problem is that time machines do not exist. Today, governments face the overwhelming task of adapting to a world equipped with the knowledge of nuclear weapons. Many question the role of nuclear arms and argue that these weapons should be swiftly and permanently abolished. While this response appears simple, many factors make the issue of atomic weapons more complex and difficult to manage. There are strong arguments on both sides, but ultimately, not banning nuclear weapons proves as a more comprehensive and logical solution to the threats that these weapons present in the 21st century. Nuclear weapons should not be banned for two reasons: primarily, complete disarmament efforts would be ineffective and hazardous, and secondly, these weapons sustain the global power balance, thus maintaining peace.
References
Atomic Heritage Foundation. “Science behind the Atom Bomb - Nuclear Museum.” Https://Ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/, Atomic Heritage Foundation, 5 June 2014, ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/ahf/history/science-behind-atom-bomb/.
Bamford, Tyler. “The Most Fearsome Sight: The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima.” The National WWII Museum, The National WWII Museum, 6 Aug. 2020, www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/atomic-bomb-hiroshima.
Dodge, Michaela. “U.S. Nuclear Weapons.” The Heritage Foundation, 24 Jan. 2024, www.heritage.org/military-strength/assessment-us-military-power/us-nuclear-weapons. ICAN. “The Cost of Nuclear Weapons.”
ICAN, 2023, www.icanw.org/the_cost_of_nuclear_weapons.
Ice, Lauren, et al. “Wartime Fatalities in the Nuclear Era.” Statistics and Public Policy, vol. 9, no. 1, Mar. 2022, pp. 49–57, https://doi.org/10.1080/2330443x.2022.2038744.
Jaramillo, Cesar. “Six Deceptive Arguments against a Nuclear Weapons Ban.” Open Canada, 31 Mar. 2017, opencanada.org/six-deceptive-arguments-against-nuclear-weapons-ban/.
Kallenborn, Zachary. “Why a Nuclear Weapons Ban Would Threaten, Not Save, Humanity.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 10 Jan. 2024, thebulletin.org/2024/01/why-a-nuclear-weapons-ban-would-threaten-not-save-humanity/.
Maman, Jen. “Greenpeace International.” Greenpeace International, 26 Sept. 2018, www.greenpeace.org/international/story/18631/five-reasons-prohibition-of-nuclear-weapons/.
Melley, Brendan. “Nuclear Terrorism - Imminent Threat?” Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction, 17 Nov. 2017, wmdcenter.ndu.edu/Publications/Publication-View/Article/1375207/nuclear-terrorism-imminent-threat/.
“Nuclear Weapons and Our Catholic Response: A Catholic Study Guide for Use with Nuclear Tipping Point Instructions for the Facilitator.” 2020, www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/war-and-peace/nuclear-weapons/upload/nuclear-weapons-and-our-catholic-response-study-guide.pdf.
“The Challenge of Peace: God’s Promise and Our Response’ Pastoral Letter on War and Peace by the National Conference of Catholic Bishops of the United States.” Bulletin of Peace Proposals, vol. 15, no. 3, July 1984, pp. 244–51, https://doi.org/10.1177/096701068401500308.
United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. “Nuclear Weapons.” United Nations, 2024, disarmament.unoda.org/wmd/nuclear/.
“Weapons of Terror: Freeing the World of Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Arms.” Proquest.com, 2025, www.proquest.com/docview/197456043/F4C50F72DBC6431CPQ/3?sourcetype=Scholarly%2www.proquest.com/docview/197456043/F4C50F72DBC6431CPQ/3?sourcetype=Scholarly%2.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Gianna Casck